Mal Fletcher comments on the Scottish Independence debate

The reader may find a level of over-simplification in all of this, but nowhere near as much as we hear from those who push Scottish independence on the basis that the nation should or could become another Nordic 'miracle'.

In the end, the debate about independence may generate more heat than light, with some voters being swayed one way or the other largely on the basis of emotion.

As an Australian import to Britain I can understand the emotional pull of independence. Yet passion will not be enough to resolve important challenges that will arise should Scotland choose to remove itself.

Another factor that may play a decisive role in the outcome is the youth vote. Relatively recent polls suggest that young people, especially in the 16-17 bracket, are more likely to vote 'no' to independence.

This is the very age group Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond was hoping would boost his cause, when he insisted they be allowed to vote.

In general, the younger end of the Millennial generation are globalised from birth. Digital technologies and cheap travel have meant that they've grown up thinking of the world as their global village.

They naturally expect political leaders to address issues on a global rather than simply local scale. So, they're not naturally inclined to think that smaller is better.

In the end, barring any significant seismic event between now and September's vote, many Scots may come to believe that, feelings aside, there are many very pragmatic reasons to stay within the union.

In casting their ballot, they may acknowledge their hearts but vote with their heads.

Whatever the eventual outcome, while there may be good reasons for Scotland to break away, the Scandinavian argument should be laid to rest.