Mal Fletcher comments
Continued from page 2
Writing in recently in The Times, Professor John Sutherland of University College London discusses the impact of the new breed of Scandinavian crime writers on the great British detective novel.
The proliferation of Scandinavian crime stories in our bestseller lists and on TV listings, he suggests, is evidence of a 'growing-up moment'. Now, he says, British crime writers may stop pretending that evil is something foreign to civilisation and, instead of 'taming the tiger' within, actually confront it.
Swedish writers such as Henning Menkell and Stieg Larsson, he says, have been doing this for quite a while. Menkell has given the world the Wallander novels, a favourite of mine. The main character, Kurt Wallander, could not be described as a religious figure, but he is quite philosophical.
He often ponders how, in a supposedly civilised society, in which liberal ideals were supposed to have wiped out barbarism, individual people can display violence of the most horrific kind.
John Sutherland says, 'There is one thing [the Scandinavians] believe, in their Calvinistic way, that you can never put right. The old Adam.'
'Beneath the peace, prosperity, culture and education, is the evil that no welfare state, however benign, can eradicate.'
The professor was addressing detective fiction, not events in Norway. But his words have a resonance here.
Politics alone cannot solve the problem of evil, or acts of evil. The fact is that at its most fundamental level evil is not primarily a societal problem, but an individual one.
Science can play its part in tackling this challenge, particularly through psychiatry and psychology and to some degree sociology.
But religion, so often cast as the villain of the piece, can play a role. Particularly religion which recognizes the latent potential for evil within human nature itself, the need for justice in the face of atrocities and the possibility for regeneration and redemption.
Our thoughts are with the people of Norway who've suffered their worst crime since the Second World War. We should also pause to reflect on how thin is the veneer of civilization and how much we each need to play a role in guarding its freedoms.
The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those held by Cross Rhythms. Any expressed views were accurate at the time of publishing but may or may not reflect the views of the individuals concerned at a later date.
Thank You for the opportunity to express an opinion as outsider:
You state at the 3rd paragraph from the END UP: I quote:
The bombing may well not have been about general indiscriminate killing but, in the twisted logic of a deranged person, inflicting damage on specific political ideals or the general political system.
I don't see this criminals -that take the law in their own hands- as psychopaths, crazy, unbalanced and deranged persons. To me this is insulting, to the unfortunate that fit your description. You are insulting the unfortunate by taking a criminal murderer and fit him with them.
This criminal is going to a luxurious cell. Paid by the people that he already committed crime against. He is on the news, and will be there for a long time. History will treat him well; you believe me. The Media and the "civilized system" will ensure his leaves a comfortable life. You will ask me what is the alternative. Well, we do not have one. But the way Society works and lives today, I am not surprised that there are people that commit this kind of atrocities. Remember please, this criminals are playing by the rules that have been created by the "civilized, democratic, MULTICULTURAL Societies" ALL over the world
May G'D Be we us. We need him more than ever to give wisdom to our minds.
Thank You,
Simha