Report Abuse

Use this form to report abuse on the Cross Rhythms website.

Name
Email address
Article Title:	Dawkins Delusion
Author of reported comment:	Tim
Comment Date:	09:51 on Mar 2 2007
Comment:	I disagree with the statement made by Edmund. As a past social constructionist student I believe it is impossible to approach any argument, science, faith, theory without any set of values or bias. To do so would mean you would have to disconnect yourself from being human, being totally impartial is humanly impossible. Secondly, what I think Paul Taylor is trying to say is Dawkins takes for granted that a reputable Biblical scholar is someone who rubbishes the bible, whereas Paul Tayor believes the opposite. The point he is trying to make is either is an opinion, and should not be stated as a fact, as in Dawkins book.

Tell us the details of your complaint:
	For verification, please type the word shown above in the box below [try a different word]