LISTEN
WEBCAM
CHART
Latest Track:
home
radio
Cross Rhythms City Radio (Stoke) 101.8FM
Cross Rhythms Plymouth 96.3FM
Listen Again
Online Radio
Syndication
xRhythms
xRhythms DAB
music
Artist Partnerships
Artist Profiles
Chart
Music Articles
Music News
Reviews
life
Key Quotes
Life Articles
Life Files
Prayer Rooms
training
Voluntary Opportunities
Work Experience
contact us
about us
Advertising
Contact Us
Cross Rhythms Board of Trustees
Cross Rhythms Founders
Directions
History and Vision
RSS Feeds
Site Map
donate
Location:
Home
Report Abuse
Use this form to report abuse on the Cross Rhythms website.
Name
Email address
Article Title:
Sir David Attenborough - "Why I Don't Mention God"
Author of reported comment:
Andrew
Comment Date:
10:46 on Feb 16 2008
Comment:
I have a PhD in electronics and was most definitely a sceptic of all things spiritual but I came to Christ a few years ago – an event that thoroughly changed my life. My weak faith was and still is greatly assisted by reading about the weight of evidence in astronomy, molecular biology, archaeology and the historicity of the bible. Now I know there are many of you that reading this will think “What evidence!?” ... “This can all be disproved”. Let me tell you what got me. Firstly, in electronics there is something called Information Theory. This deals with the maths of encoding and transmitting data. I did a lot of work in this area and found that when information was transmitted, the received information was the same, or less than that sent. The transmission in a mobile phone is often corrupted by interference. This interference is always meaningless and detracts from the information; it does not add to it. The way DNA is present in living organisms smacks of information theory. The density of information is enormous – 3 billion codes. The complexity of the information is staggering. The information is copied as cells are duplicated and the information is error checked as it’s copied. If errors are introduced by chance mutations they must, according to the laws of information theory, detract from the information in the DNA. The probability of introducing meaningful information is ridiculously small. For living things to evolve from a single-cell to a man requires a staggering net increase in information. This cannot be accounted for by random mutations in DNA any more than if I leave my computer on for a billion years, chance errors in the memory will eventually cause it to code the next version of windows. Static on your television is not fun to watch. That’s because it’s randomly generated. This is the same random that some attribute to causing living creatures to evolve, over billions of years, from single-celled amoebas to complex animals.
Tell us the details of your complaint:
For verification, please type the word shown above in the box below
[try a different word]
Bookmark
Tell a friend
Connect with Cross Rhythms by signing up to our email mailing list
Artists & DJs A-Z
#
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
#
Or keyword search
Live on the edge and shout what you believe in our Dedication Room